Dillingham v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Charles Dillingham |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 1:2013cv00468 |
| July 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BUTLER |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER ADOPTING 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Document 58 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
58
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEFFROM JUDGMENT 57 - It is respectfully recommended that the instant Motion for Relief from Judgment be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should b e denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/14/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
47
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - Because Dillingham has not shown a manifest error of law in denying his motion for evidentiary hearing at this stage of the proceedings, his Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/29/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
41
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS = Based on the foregoing analysis, it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 9/19/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/2/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
37
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice and that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. Objections to R&R due by 8/14/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/28/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Dillingham - it is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Pe titioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify 29 to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/6/2014. (gh1)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/5/2014. (gh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dillingham v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles Dillingham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
