Garrett et al v. West Chester Police Department et al
| Martel Garrett and Farnolia Garrett |
| John Doe, John Hand, John Ruebusch, Hamilton County Sheriff Dept.(RECI), Erik Niehaus, Bradford Walraven, Andrew Schweier, West Chester Police Department, Jane Doe, Mike Last Name Unknown and Richard Barrett |
| 1:2013cv00499 |
| July 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BUTLER |
| Sandra S Beckwith |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 77 ; 1) The complaint against John Hand is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of proper service; The Hamilton County defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and judgment is granted in favor of John Ruebusch and the Hamilton County Sheriffs Department; The complaint against Richard Barrett (Previous 7441 Apt. 10" is DISMISSED sua sponte; Plaintiffs motions for leave to amend the complaint are DENIED; Plaintiffs motion to review and exa mine the Property Room to identify any unreturned items that the Defendants, illegally confiscated and did not return is DENIED AS MOOT; The Hamilton County defendants and West Chester defendants motions for sanctions are GRANTED, and plaintiffs are SANCTIONED as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 5/28/14. (mb)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER that the West Chester defendants' joint motion 44 to quash subpoena/stay discovery is Denied as Moot. Plaintiff's motion 49 for discovery is Denied as Moot. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION that the 3 complaint against defendant john H and be Dismissed without prejudice for lack of proper service; the Hamilton County defendants' motion for summary judgment 64 be Granted and judgment be granted in favor of defendants John Ruebusch and the Hamilton County Sheriff's Depart ment (RECI) on all claims against them; the complaint against defendant "Richard Barrett (Previous 7441 Apt. 10)" be Dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to add "Denorver Garrett, Et. Al" as plaintiff's 63 be Denied; Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint to add "Miller Valentine Group Tall Timber Apts. Owner Where the Plaintiffs, lived" as a defednant 58 be Den ied; Plaintiff F. Garrett's motion to "review and examine the Property Room to identify any unreturned items that the Defendants, illegally confiscated and did not return" 56 be Denied as Moot; the Hamilton County defendants and West Chester defendants' motion for sanctions 34 and 43 be Granted, and that plaintiff be sanctioned as follows: (1) any complaint plaintiffs seek to file in this Court should include a copy of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation; the complaint should be subject to initial judicial review to determine if plaintiffs seek to re-litigate the same disputes underlying this case, monetary sanctions should be imposed; and (2) Plaintiffs should be strongly admonished that monetary sa nctions in the form of attorneys fees may be imposed under Rule 11 if they engage in future filings in this lawsuit that are deemed friviolous or presented for an imporper purpose under Rule 11. ( Objections to R&R due by 5/8/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/21/2014. (art)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that defendants' 25 Motion to strike is Granted. Plaintiff's Doc. #24 reply memorandum for Hamilton Cty. Sheriff Office John Ruebusch is hereby Stricken from the record. Plaintiffs' 27 Motion to deny defendants' motion to strike is Denied. Plaintiff's 28 Motion to strike the Hamilton County defendants' answer is Denied. Plaintiffs' 36 Motion to examine all personnel files is Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the West Chester defendants&# 039; 17 Motion to dismiss the complaint be Granted; Plaintiff's 14 Motion for leave to amend the complaint be Denied; Plaintiffs' 15 40 Motions for Court Orders be Denied as Moot. ( Objections to R&R due by 1/2/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/16/2013. (art) Modified on 12/16/2013 (art).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
