Gill v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Petitioner: Wesley Gill
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Case Number: 1:2013cv00578
Filed: August 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendation and 26 Report and Recommendation; the Petition is dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. A certificate of appealability is denied and any app eal would be objectively frivolous. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/26/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified docket text on 10/27/2015 (eh).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/22/2014. (kpf1)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Gill did not file his Petition in this Court until August 21, 2013, more than three and one-half years after the statute of limitations expired. The Petition should therefore be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the s tatute of limitations. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/5/2014. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gill v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wesley Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?