Tepper v. Fifth Third Bank
Maury M Tepper |
Fifth Third Bank |
1:2013cv00650 |
September 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan J Dlott |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Schwartz, Seth) |
Filing 10 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Plaintiff Primary Expert due by 4/15/2014. Defendant Primary Expert due by 5/30/2014. Discovery due by 7/31/2014. Motions not directed to pleadings due by 9/15/2014. Status Conference on settlement set for 3/5/2014 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/9/2015 02:00 PM in Chambers before Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. Jury Trial set for 2/23/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 - Cincinnati before Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott.. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1) |
Filing 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 12/11/13. (wam1) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 12/4/2013. Scheduling order to follow. (wam1) |
Filing 8 RULE 26(f) REPORT Parties Joint Discovery Plan by Plaintiff Maury M Tepper. (Shane, Steven) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Schwartz, Seth) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey P Hinebaugh for Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Hinebaugh, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/4/2013 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (vp) |
Set/Reset Deadlines per stipulation: Fifth Third Bank answer due 10/28/2013. (lk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth A. Schwartz for Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Schwartz, Seth) |
Filing 3 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 10/28/2013. by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Schwartz, Seth) Modified docket text on 10/17/2013 (wam1). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Fifth Third Bank. (jlw) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman. (jlw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Fifth Third Bank ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-4263073), filed by Maury M Tepper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Shane, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tepper v. Fifth Third Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Maury M Tepper | |
Represented By: | Steven Charles Shane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey P Hinebaugh |
Represented By: | Seth A. Schwartz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.