Chapman v. Lawson et al
| Charles Chapman |
| Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny, Mike Keeling, Simon L Lies, Jr., James E. Craig, Dennis Helmick, Hamilton County of, Cincinnati City of and Sprint Spectrum L.P./Sprint INC./Nextel West Corporation |
| 1:2013cv00652 |
| September 17, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| MARION |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 45 Report and Recommendations; denying 52 Motion to Stay; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss; granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/24/15. (ba1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/23/13. It is ORDERED that the 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Claims against defendants Mark Tiereny, MikeKeeling, Dennis Helmick, Simon Leis, Jr., and James E. Craig are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claims under the Fifth and Ninth Amendments and claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988 are DISMISSED. (eh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
