Vore v. Warden Richland Correctional Institution
| William Bernard Vore |
| Warden Richland Correctional Institution |
| 1:2013cv00800 |
| November 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER by Susan J. Dlott denying 41 Motion to Vacate. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
47
SUPPLEMENT TO REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - It is again respectfully recommended that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)(ECF No. 41) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/17/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/31/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
45
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - It is again respectfully recommended that Vore's Motion for Relief from Judgment be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/19/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
42
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT denying 41 Motion to Vacate 41 MOTION to Vacate 39 Clerk's Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/30/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs 19 and 23); petition is dismissed with prejudice and petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; court certifies to the sixth circuit court of appeals that any appeal from this order is objectively frivolous. (vp)
|
|
Filing
35
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of Vore's Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/17/2014. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
31
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the C ourt should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 12/8/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/20/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ORDER - Vore's proposed additional claim is not so obviously futile as to be frivolous. Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED and the Petition is deemed amended to add the claim quoted above. Petitioner and Respondent have sufficiently argued the merits of this claim that no further briefing is needed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/30/2014. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vore v. Warden Richland Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Bernard Vore | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Richland Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
