Bryant v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Derrick Bryant |
| Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 1:2013cv00803 |
| November 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BUTLER |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 30). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/30/2016. (mr) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
30
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that petitioner's 28 MOTION for relief from final judgment be Denied; and petitioner's 29 AMENDED MOTION for relief from judgment be Transferred to the US Court of Appeals for review and determination whether the district court should be granted authorization to entertain the motion as a habeas corpus petition. A certificate of appealability should not issue. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/8/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
21
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 18 ). Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED and Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/30/2015. (mr1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 10 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted and that petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed with prejudice. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and the refore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/26/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/9/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 14 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/15/2014. (mr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bryant v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Derrick Bryant | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
