Ojile v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Defendant: Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Petitioner: Ugbe Ojile
Case Number: 1:2013cv00844
Filed: November 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 and 26 Report and Recommendations. The Petition is denied with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/30/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 8/17/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/30/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD - Petitioner Ugbe Ojile's Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/2/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Ojile's Petition is without merit and should be dismissed with prejudice. Because of the length of the pleadings in this case (160 pages for the Memorandum in Support and Response) and the fact that the parties have not explicitly addressed the question, the Magistrate Judge makes no recommendation at this point on whether a certificate of appealability should issue on any of Ojile's claims. If Ojile files objections to this Report, he is ordered to include any argument he wishes the Court to consider on a certificate of appealability. All further filings in this case by either party must comply with the Magistrate Judge's Standing Order requiring all record references to include the Page Identifi cation Number. The Order is available on Non-complying filings will be stricken. Objections to R&R due by 12/19/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/2/2014. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying petitioner's 8 Motion to supplement the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/12/2014. (art)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ojile v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ugbe Ojile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Represented By: Hilda Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?