Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

Petitioner:	Denise Graves, r
Respondent:	Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Case Number:	1:2013cv00886
Filed:	December 4, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	UNION
Presiding Judge:	William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 18, 2014	Filing 7 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 3/17/14. IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. (eh1)
January 14, 2014	Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/14/2014. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 18, 2014

Filing 7 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 3/17/14. IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. (eh1)

January 14, 2014

Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/14/2014. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Denise Graves, r
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?