Potter v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Brian Wayne Potter |
| Commissioner of Social Security and SSA |
| 1:2014cv00007 |
| January 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| LAWRENCE |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Motion to Remand filed by Commissioner of Social Security, the Court GRANTS the defendants motion (Doc. 18) to remand.The decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiffs application for supplemental securityincome is REVERSED and this matter is hereby REMANDED for further proceedings pursuantto Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 10/17/2014. (jlw1)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant's 18 MOTION for volutary Remand be Granted. The decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's application for SSI be reversed and this matter be Remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC 405(g). Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/16/2014. (art)
|
|
Filing
8
SCHEDULING ORDER pursuant to Magistrate Judge's General Order concerning social security appeals. Plaintiff's statement of errors due to be filed with the Court by 5/30/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/14/2014. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
