Perdue v. Ohio Department of Corrections, et al.
Plaintiff: Robert E. Perdue
Defendant: Ohio Department of Corrections, Gary Mohr, Doctor Ahmed and Christine Massey
Case Number: 1:2014cv00084
Filed: January 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: SCIOTO
Presiding Judge: Sandra S Beckwith
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing plaintiff's complaint. A certificate of appealability will not issue; plaintiff is denied leave to appeal IFP. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 5/31/16. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 33 Plantiff's Motion for TRO ; denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations [37 & 38]. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 4/14/15. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/18/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 12 ; Plaintiff's claims against Christine Massey are DISMISSED; Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's objection to the R&R are overruled. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 4/28/14. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perdue v. Ohio Department of Corrections, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E. Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Mohr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor Ahmed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Massey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?