Jackson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Jackson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Jackson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Lorenzo P Jackson
Respondent:	Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2014cv00128
Filed:	February 7, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	S Arthur Spiegel
Presiding Judge:	J. Gregory Wehrman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 22, 2015	Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 30, 2014	Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Motion for a Stay and Abeyance 2 is accordingly DENIED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, both original 7 and as renewed 18 , is li kewise DENIED. The Court directs the Magistrate Judge to establish a briefing schedule to allow Respondent to address the merits of the four remaining grounds set forth in the petition, with an opportunity for Petitioner to file his traverse, so that these remaining claimswhich have been fully exhausted in the state courtscan proceed to judgment. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 10/30/2014. (km1)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 22, 2015

Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

October 30, 2014

Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Motion for a Stay and Abeyance 2 is accordingly DENIED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, both original 7 and as renewed 18 , is li kewise DENIED. The Court directs the Magistrate Judge to establish a briefing schedule to allow Respondent to address the merits of the four remaining grounds set forth in the petition, with an opportunity for Petitioner to file his traverse, so that these remaining claimswhich have been fully exhausted in the state courtscan proceed to judgment. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 10/30/2014. (km1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Lorenzo P Jackson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Represented By:	William H Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?