Pettus-Brown vs Warden, Correctional Reception Center
| LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown |
| Warden, Correctional Reception Center |
| 1:2014cv00292 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| PICKAWAY |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 75 Report and Recommendation denying 74 Motion for Relase on Personal Recognizance. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/29/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
75
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELEASE ON PERSONAL RECOGNIANCE - re 74 MOTION filed by LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/9/2016. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 53 Report and Recommendation dismissing the Petition with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/2/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
65
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/10/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
53
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Petition should be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Ci rcuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/12/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) PID Notified
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Withdraw/Reconsideration; and denying 41 Motion to Strike; overruling 33 39 41 46 Objections to Magistrate Judge Order; 29 Order, 30 Scheduling Order and 32 34 38 42 Orders and 4/28/2015 and 5/16/2015 Notational Orders remain in effect. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/4/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Because the Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) was filed without Court permission and in any event prematurely, it is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/7/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 Report and Recommendations and 22 Report and Recommendation; granting in part 8 Motion to Dismiss - case shall be stayed pending outcome of Petitioner's direct appeal; and denying 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/19/15. (ba1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; STATEMENT OF THE STATUS OF THE CASE - Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider Request for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. No. 25) is again DENIED, albeit without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/2/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
SUBSTITUTE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART; ORDER DENYING EVIDENTIARY HEARING - The Warden's Motion to Dismiss is MOOT and in lieu of a stay, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Motion to Dismiss be denied and Petitioner's Motion for Jud gment on the Pleadings should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2015. Finally, Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/22/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Court find Pettus-Brown has not exhausted his available state court remedies, at least on the record presently before this Court. Rather than dismissing the case, however, it is als o recommended that the case be stayed pending the outcome of Pettus-Brown's direct appeal. Finally, it is recommended the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be denied. The parties are ORDERED to keep this Court currently advised of the proceed ings in the state court appeal. Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/6/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pettus-Brown vs Warden, Correctional Reception Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Correctional Reception Center | |
| Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
