Balimunkwe v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Kalemba Balimunkwe |
Bank of America, N.A. and Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. |
1:2014cv00327 |
April 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Timothy S. Black |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 135 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/29/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 135 ORDER that plaintiff's 102 MOTION for leave to file a memorandum in opposition to defendant RCS's motion for summary judgment is Denied as moot; Plaintiff's 123 & 125 MOTION for review of the summary of events and MOTION for a he aring on his request for review are Denied; Plaintiff's 121 Request for leave of court to take another look at the signatures and plaintiff's 122 Motion for another look at the signatures for the pursuit of truth and justice are Denied; Plaintiff's 86 Motion for an extension of time to file two supplemental affidavits in support of his claims and plaintiff's 110 Motion for leave to file the two supplemental affidavits with any references to Curtis Baggett ommitted are Denied; Defendant BOA's 96 Motion to strike the second supplemental affidavit is Denied as moot; Plaintiff's 132 Request for leave of court to allow the court to see the truth is Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 109 MOTION for leave to obtain another handwriting expert be Denied; Plaintiff's 112 MOTION to designate Wendy Carlson as his handwriting expert be Denied; Plaintiff's 128 MOTION to amend his previous request to designate a new han dwriting expert and plaintiff's 129 amended request be Denied; Plaintiff's 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Denied; Defendant BOA's 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Granted; and Defendant RCS's 85 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Granted. ( Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2016). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/6/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 119 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 107 ); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT CURTIS BAGGETT FROM FUTURE MOTIONS, HEARINGS, AND TRIAL (DOC. 71 ); AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A RULING ON THE MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT CURTIS BAGGETT (DOC. 104 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/2/2015. (mr) |
Filing 107 ORDER that plaintiff's 72 Motion for Extension of Time to complete the expert report is Denied; defendants' 80 Motion to Strike the supplement to the expert report is Granted; the supplement 74 to the expert report is Stricken from the record; plaintiff's 103 MOTION for leave to file a response to defendants' motion to strike is Denied; Defendants' 97 MOTION to strike plaintiff's amended motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's supplemental memo randum in opposition to defendants' joint motion to exclude expert Curt Baggett is Granted; plaintiff's 89 amended motion for summary judgment and plaintiff's 90 supplemental memorandum in opposition to defendants' joint motio n to exclude expert Curt Baggett are Stricken from the record. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 71 MOTION to exclude expert Curtis Baggett from future proceedings in this case be Granted; plaintiff be granted ten (10) days from the date the District Judge issues his ruling on this R&R to respond to defendants' motions for summary judgment in accordance with the Order issued on 6/3/2015 (Doc. 88); plaintiff's 104 MOTION to exclude expert Curtis Baggett be Denied as moot. ( Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/3/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 64 ORDER that plaintiff's amended requests 57 & 58 amended requests for production of documents and admissions are hereby Stricken from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/4/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 47 & 48 MOTIONS to strike and to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/17/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 46 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 40 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/5/2014. (mr1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.