Thomas v. Officer Hicks et al
James Thomas |
G. Wilburn, Officer Hicks and Jim Neil |
1:2014cv00328 |
April 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R. Barrett |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 12 Report and Recommendation dismissing this matter for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/30/14. (ba1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 12 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Recommended that the instant action be DISMISSED for want of prosecution and the Court certify that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. It is Ordered that the 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 6 Motion To Amend Portion Of The April 22, 2014 Filed Complaint's Relief, 8 Motion To Amend Plaintiff's 4/22/14 Filed Complaint W/ Additional Violative Ch arges; And A Portion Of The Relief For Defendant Jim Neil, and 9 Motion For The Service Of The United States Marshal are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/24/14. (sct1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.