Brooks, et al. v. Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington School District, et al.
| Austin Brooks, Vincent Brooks and Randy Brooks |
| Susie Jane Skinner, Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington School District, Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington Board of Education and Martha Ann Hasslebusch |
| 1:2014cv00412 |
| May 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BROWN |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Amended MOTION to Strike Expert Report of Dr. Edward Dragan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/10/15. (sct)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER Granting defendants' 49 Motion for Summary Judgment for defendants Hasselbusch and Skinner on plaintiffs' Title VI claims against them; Denied on plaintiffs' Title VI claims against RULH; Granted on plaintiffs' official c apacity claims under Sec. 1983 against defendants Hasselbusch and Skinner; Denied on plaintiffs' Sec. 1983 claims against RULH and against defendants Hasselbusch and Skinner in their individual capacities; and Denied on defendants Hasselbusch and Skinner's claims of qualified immunity. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/15/2015. (art)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting defendants' 37 Motion to Withdraw 34 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/7/2015. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
