Lankford v. RelaDyne, LLC
Roger Paul Lankford |
RelaDyne, LLC |
1:2014cv00682 |
August 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Timothy S. Black |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER granting in part plaintiff's 88 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is Awarded $208,165.00 in attorney fees. Further, plaintiff is Awarded costs and expenses in the amount of $7,023.77. The parties are Directed that no prej udgment interest is to be applied to the award of attorneys' fees and costs. Plaintiff's 93 Motion for post judgment interest is Granted. The parties are Directed that post judgment interest on plaintiff's award of back pay, prejud gment interest, and liquidated damages, as well as the award of attorneys' fees and costs, should be assessed from the date of the Court's May 10,2016 judgment at a rate of 0.52%. Plaintiff's 92 Motion to Clairfy the prejudgmen t interest rate and duration is Granted. Plaintiff is Awarded $9,721.59 in prejudgment interest on his award of back pay. thus plaintiff is Awarded a total of $304,878.60 in back pay, prejudgment interest, and liquidated damages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/29/2016. (art) |
Filing 89 ORDER that the Court awards plaintiff $142,717.71 in FMLA liquidated damages plus prejudgment interest on this jury award as provided by 29 USC Sections 2617(a)(1)(A)(ii) & (iii). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/10/2016. (art) |
Filing 73 ORDER that defendant's objections to the admissibility of plaintiff's medical records are Overruled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/8/2016. (art) |
Filing 64 ORDER granting defendants' unopposed 54 Motion to Bifurcate. The trial commencing on 4/11/2016 shall be bifurcated into compensatory and punitive damages phases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/6/2016. (art) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying plaintiff's 48 Motion in Limine to the extent that plaintiff seeks exclusion of the post-termination evidence pursuant to FRCP 8(c); and The Court reserves ruling on plaintiff's 48 Motion in Limine to the extent that plaintiff seeks exlusion of the post-termination evidence pursuant to FRE 403. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/1/2016. (art) |
Filing 47 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. 15 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/4/2015. (mr) |
Filing 46 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 19 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/19/2015. (mr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lankford v. RelaDyne, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roger Paul Lankford | |
Represented By: | Peter Friedmann |
Represented By: | Gregory R Mansell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: RelaDyne, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.