Durham v. Moore et al
| Roy A. Durham, Jr. |
| Ernie Moore, Gary C Mohr, Rob Jeffreys, Gary Croft, Eugene Hunyadi, Antonio Lee, Stephen Gray, Earlina Myers, Tom Schweitzer, James Quinn, Michael De'Martino, Jennifer Rutherford, Douglas Luneke, Peter Pablo, Kevin Saulbeamer, Seth Woods, Dan Hudson, Jason Saylor, Brian Storer, Robin Bishop, David Ritz, Adam Prittchard, Scott Burns, Jonathan Risener, James Kelly and Donald Morgan |
| 1:2014cv00816 |
| October 20, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| LUCAS |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying plaintiff's motion for modification of the payment order and joinder of payment. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendations, 18 Report and Recommendations, 23 Report and Recommendations. With respect to the Report and Recommendation filed on 1/29/2015 (Doc. 11 ) and the objections ( Doc. 17 ) the Court ORDERS that the claims asserted in the amended complaint against Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (SOCF) and Toledo Correctional Institution (ToCI) defendants as well as against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) defendants based on incidents that occurred at SOCF and ToCi are DISMISSED without prejudice. With respect to the Report and Recommendation filed on 3/20/2015 (Doc. 18 ) and the objections filed on 4/7/2015 (Doc. 20 ), the C ourt ORDERS plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the Courts orders of 1/29/2015 and 2/20/2015. Plaintiff's objections to the 1/29/2015 Order and Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17 ) are OVERRULED. The Court certifies that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. The Court determines from the Report and Recommendation issued 7/7/2015 (Doc. 23 ) that the plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/24/2015. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
