Harris vs. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, et al
| Joseph Harris |
| Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas and Jim Neil |
| 1:2015cv00189 |
| March 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court does determine Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: Petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 (Doc . 1) is DENIED with PREJUDICE; A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is DENIED; and An application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/2/2015. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is Recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) be DENIED with prejudice, a certificate of appealability s hould not issue, the Court should certify that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in "good faith", and leave to appeal IFP should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/13/15. (sct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
