Vunda v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Vunda v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Vunda v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Petitioner:	Paul D. Vunda
Respondent:	Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Case Number:	1:2015cv00301
Filed:	May 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	WARREN
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 22, 2016	Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that su ch Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, the petitioners pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/22/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 3, 2016	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that petitioner's re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Denied with prejudice. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/20/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/2/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 22, 2016

Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that su ch Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, the petitioners pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/22/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

May 3, 2016

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that petitioner's re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Denied with prejudice. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/20/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/2/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vunda v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul D. Vunda
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Represented By:	Maura O'Neill Jaite
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?