Steele v. Warden London Correctional Facility
| Julian T Steele |
| Warden London Correctional Facility |
| 1:2015cv00349 |
| May 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| MADISON |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER accepting and adopting the 6 5/4/2016 initial R&R as to Grounds Two through Ten; and the 18 9/26/2016 substituted R&R as to Ground One; Petitioner's 8 19 objections to these R&Rs, to the extent they discuss Ground One, are overrul ed; the 1 Petition is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, the Court certifies that any appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit would be objectively frivolous and Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/21/2022. (kkz)
|
|
Filing
18
SUBSTITUTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON FIRST GROUND FOR RELIEF - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that the First Ground for Relief be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge has already recommended that the other Grounds for Re lief be similarly dismissed and Petitioner filed no objections. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/26/2016. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
10
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/6/2016. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the C ourt should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/4/2016. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steele v. Warden London Correctional Facility | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Julian T Steele | |
| Represented By: | Gloria L Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden London Correctional Facility | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
