Hardy v. Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas et al
Thomas Hardy |
Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County Commissioners, Director, Lawrence CDJFS-Bureau of State Hearings, Commissioner of Social Security and Ohio Department of Job and Family Services |
1:2015cv00373 |
June 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
LAWRENCE |
Michael R. Barrett |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Supplemental Security Income |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 8 Report and Recommendation granting 2 and 6 Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/4/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 2 and 6 MOTIONS TO DISMISS filed by defendants the United States and the Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services be Granted. The complaint against defendants Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, Lawrenc e County Commissioners, and Director, Lawrence CDJFS-Bureau of State Hearings be Dismissed pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 11/27/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/10/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.