Digonno v. City of Hamilton OH

Digonno v. City of Hamilton OH

Plaintiff:	Nicholas J Digonno
Defendant:	Hamilton, City of
Case Number:	1:2015cv00432
Filed:	June 30, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Barrett
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2017	Filing 35 ORDER that defendant's 29 motion for summary judgment is Granted in part; Plaintiff's due process claim (Count 1) is Dismissed with prejudice as barred by principles of res judicata; Plaintiff's takings claim (Count 2) is Dismissed w ithout prejudice because it is not ripe for review; To the extent plaintiff's negligence claim (Count 3) is not barred by principles of re judicata, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this state law claim and that claim is Dissed without prejudice; and this matter is Terminated from the docket of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/28/2017. (art)
December 30, 2016	Filing 30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, provided that any party may upon good cause shown within (60) days reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/30/2016. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2017

Filing 35 ORDER that defendant's 29 motion for summary judgment is Granted in part; Plaintiff's due process claim (Count 1) is Dismissed with prejudice as barred by principles of res judicata; Plaintiff's takings claim (Count 2) is Dismissed w ithout prejudice because it is not ripe for review; To the extent plaintiff's negligence claim (Count 3) is not barred by principles of re judicata, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this state law claim and that claim is Dissed without prejudice; and this matter is Terminated from the docket of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/28/2017. (art)

December 30, 2016

Filing 30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, provided that any party may upon good cause shown within (60) days reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/30/2016. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Digonno v. City of Hamilton OH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas J Digonno
Represented By:	David Theodore Davidson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hamilton, City of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?