Bard v. Brown County et al
| Ashley Bard |
| Brown County, Dwayne Wenninger, Ryan Wedmore, Larry Meyer, Jason Huff, George Dunning, Sarah McKenzie, Zane Schadle, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2015cv00643 |
| October 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| CLERMONT |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER setting case for trial. Final pretrial conference set for 6/18/19 at 10:00 a.m. in Chambers. Jury Trial set for 7/29/2019 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 7 - Cincinnati before Judge Susan J. Dlott. Denying 118 MOTION for Mandate filed by Ashley Bard.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 4/2/19. (wam)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is granted to defendants on all claims except for the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Deputy Wedmore. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 2/13/19. (wam)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER that defendants are awarded sanctions against plaintiff's counsel in the amount of $10,694.16 for reasonable attorney fees and expenses defendants incurred as a result of the failure of plaintiff's counsel to comply with the Court 7/31/2017 Order 47 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/27/2018. (art)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting 56 Motion for Sanctions in favor of defendants and against plaintiff's counsel. Defendants shall have fourteen (14 days) from the date of this Order to submit documentation of their reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, incurred in connection with the failure of plaintiff's counsel to comply with the Court's July 31, 2017 Order (Doc. 47). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/21/18. (sct)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Overruling 50 Objections to Magistrate Judge's July 21, 2017 Order. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 10/11/17. (wam)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER following 44 Informal Discovery Conference held on 7/26/2017. Parties shall submit a joint proposed amended calendar order to the Court by 8/2/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/27/2017. (art)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting non-party Dennis Varnau's 15 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/21/2017. (art)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER that Defendants Objections (Doc. 32) are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judges Order (Doc. 30) regarding the sequestration of Dennis Varnau is AFFIRMED. However, Defendants have leave to file at the appropriate time a well-supported motion in limine concerning Dennis Varnaus participation at trial.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/20/17. (wam)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - The Court reserves ruling on nonparty Dennis Varnaus motion to quash (Doc. 15) pending: *Submission to defendants and the Court of a privilege log that identifies the materials requested in the subpoena for which Varnau claims work product protection and provides the required information for those materials within 20 days of the date of this Order; and, *Submission of the documents identified in the privilege log to the undersigned for incamera review wi thin 20 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' request for sequestration is GRANTED only insofar as it relates to depositions in this matter. Nonparty Dennis Varnau shall not attend the deposition of any other witness or any party in this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/26/17. (sct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
