Sudberry v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center et al
| James Darnell Sudberry |
| Warden, Correctional Reception Center, Capt. Bell and Maintenance Supervisor |
| 1:2015cv00650 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| PICKAWAY |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 12 Report and Recommendation denying 11 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/9/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 7 Report and Recommendation dismissing for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/28/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 2 Report and Recommendation denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; full filing fee due due by 12/16/2015. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/16/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
