Miller v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Miller v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Miller v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Donnie Miller
Respondent:	Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2015cv00688
Filed:	October 22, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	ROSS
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 19, 2016	Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 12, 2015 (Doc. 3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ;636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 21, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 12/19/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 2, 2015	Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 12/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/2/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 19, 2016

Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 12, 2015 (Doc. 3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ;636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 21, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 12/19/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

December 2, 2015

Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 12/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/2/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Donnie Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?