Securities and Exchange Commission v. OVO Wealth Management, LLC et al
| Securities And Exchange Commission |
| OVO Wealth Management, LLC, William M. Apostelos, Connie Apostelos, WMA Enterprises, LLC, Midwest Green Resources, LLC, Apostelos Enterprises, Inc., Coleman Capital, Inc. and Silver Bridle Racing, LLC |
| 1:2015cv00699 |
| October 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF 9/25/2018 59 . Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-17-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
56
FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTSWMA ENTERPRISES, LLC; MIDWEST GREEN RESOURCES, LLC;AND OVO WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC AND RELIEF DEFENDANTSCONNIE APOSTELOS; APOSTELOS ENTERPRISES, INC.;COLEMAN CAPITAL, INC.; AND SILVER BRIDLE RACING, LLC. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10/1/18. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
50
ENTRY AND ORDER denying 39 Defendant William Apostelo's Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-16-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
46
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING THE SEC'S MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER OF WMA ENTERPRISES, LLC; MIDWEST GREEN RESOURCES, LLC; AND OVO WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC ANDFOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (DOC. 44 ) : Mr. Aposteloss Answer on his own behalf shall remain in the re cord, however since no valid answer or motion by the Corporate Entity Defendants has been filed in response to the Complaint within the time limit fixed by the Court, the Corporate Entity Defendants are in default. The Court therefore directs the Clerk to enter a default against WMA, Midwest Green and OVO. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7/20/18. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
38
ENTRY AND ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by William M. Apostelos. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-1-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
28
ENTRY AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Lift Stay. The Court GRANTS the SECs Motion to Lift Stay 27 ). Defendants and the Relief Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the Complaint 1 within 21 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2-14-208. (de)
|
|
Filing
25
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING 20 THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF PARALLEL CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS - This case is hereby STAYED until resolution of the criminal case, United States v. William M. Apostelos & Connie Apostelos, 3:15-cr-148. The United States is ORDERED to file a notice on the docket of this case upon resolution of the criminal case. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2/18/16. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
