Mattingly et al v. Humana Health Plan, Inc. et al
| Michael W. Mattingly and Myles J. Mattingly |
| Humana Health Plan, Inc., Humana Health Plan of Ohio, Inc., Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Health and Welfare Committee, J.G. Hogopain, D.A. Tiersch and Dean Wunderle |
| 1:2015cv00781 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 90 Report and Recommendations, denying 73 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, granting 74 Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, granting 75 Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/22/18. (jlm)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (Doc. 44) is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs' claim to recover benefits under § 502 of ERISA against Defendant USBS. Defendant's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (Doc. 44) is GRANTED with respect to all other claims. Defendants Humana Health Plan of Ohio, Inc., Humana Health Plan, Inc., and the Proctor & Gamble Company are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/5/17. (sct)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 3, 2016 (Doc. 18), to whom this case was referredpursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 20, 2016, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Drake v. City of Detroit, 266 Fed. Appx 444,448 (6th Cir. 2008).. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/13/2016. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
