Pryor v. Mohr et al
| Ralph E. Pryor |
| Gary Mohr, Dr. Eddy, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and John/Jane Does |
| 1:2015cv00801 |
| December 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/28/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/28/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/3/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
