Soumano v. Equifax Credit Info Ser., Inc. et al
| Habib Soumano |
| Equifax Credit Info Ser., Inc., TransUnion, Experian and Early Warnings Services, LLC |
| 1:2016cv00313 |
| February 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 40 ) 1. Defendant EWS's motion for partial dismissal/motion for more definite statement (Doc. 7 ) is DENIED; and 2. Defendant Equifax's motion to dismiss (Doc. 14 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/24/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant EWS's 7 MOTION for partial dismissal/motion for more definite statement be Denied. Defendant Equifax's 14 MOTION to dismiss the complaint be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 8/11/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/25/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
