McDougald V. Mahlman
| Jerone McDougald |
| Linnea Mahlman and Lancaster |
| 1:2016cv00317 |
| February 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Doc. 118); Plaintiff's objections (Docs. 120, 124) are OVERRULED; and Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 117) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/27/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER: Plaintiffs motion to supplement his response (Doc. 106 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs motion for leave to supplement his Objection (Doc. 110 ) is GRANTED; The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 108 ) is ADOPTED; The Objections (Doc. 109 ) are OVER RULED; Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 73 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs motion to proceed on judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/21/2018. (ss)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
108
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment 73 be GRANTED; that Plaintiff's motion to supplement his response 106 be GRANTED, despite its untimeliness; that Plaintiff's motion to proc eed on judgment 107 be DENIED as MOOT; and this case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/14/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING 62 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Order to Show Cause and TemporaryRestraining Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/31/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
50
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 46 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/21/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
36
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6 ). Plaintiff may proceed with his: (1) First Amendment retaliation claims relating to the alleged retaliatory conduct reports and cell search ag ainst Defendants Mahlman and Lancaster; (2) Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendant Mahlman; and (3) access to the courts claim against Defendants Bailey and Nolan. All other claims are dismissed on the ground that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/13/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
