Dehner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Dehner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Dehner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Richard E. Dehner
Respondent:	Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2016cv00342
Filed:	February 29, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	ROSS
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 21, 2017	Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 20] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Accordingly, respondents motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 5) is DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d), and petitioners motion forstay and abeyance (Doc. 6) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 14, 2017	Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 12 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted, the 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28:2244(d), and petitioner's 6 MOTION for Stay and abeyance be Denied. A certificate of appealability should not issue. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/14/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 21, 2017

Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 20] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Accordingly, respondents motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 5) is DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d), and petitioners motion forstay and abeyance (Doc. 6) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

February 14, 2017

Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 12 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted, the 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28:2244(d), and petitioner's 6 MOTION for Stay and abeyance be Denied. A certificate of appealability should not issue. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/14/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dehner v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard E. Dehner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?