Gallant v. Cadogan et al
Jeremy P. Gallant |
Anthony Cadogan, Faisal Ahmed, Clagg, Cool, Whittman, Frazie, Sattersfield, Mead, Mahlman, Holden, Wilson, Hunyadi and Jane/John Does |
1:2016cv00487 |
April 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
SCIOTO |
Michael R. Barrett |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 95 Report and Recommendation granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 86 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; finding as moot 92 Motion to Strike ; granting 94 Motion to Strike; granting 98 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/21/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 95 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Granted; plaintiff's 86 MOTION for leave to file a response that exceeds (20) pages be Granted; defendants' 92 MOTION to Strike non-comporting declarations submitted in opposition to their motion for summary judgment be Denied as moot; defendants' 94 MOTION to Strike plaintiff's response to defendants' reply be Granted. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/28/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/13/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 75 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 52 Report and Recommendation denying 36 Motion; denying 37 Motion for Joinder;. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/31/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 62 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 60 Report and Recommendation denying 55 Motion for Judicial Analysis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/11/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 60 ORDER that the parties' 58 & 59 Motions to extend the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines are Granted. The case scheduled is modified as follows: Discovery deadline set for 12/18/2017, Dispositive Motion deadline set for 1/16/2018. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 55 MOTION for Judicial Analysis/Acknowledgment of Amended Pleading be Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/21/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/7/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified to clarify docket text on 12/7/2017 (jlw). |
Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 36 MOTION for leave to proceed and for authorization and acceptance of filings be Denied, and that plaintiff's 37 MOTION for Joinder of parties-defendants be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/28/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 51 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 5 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 8/18/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 48 ORDER that the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines set forth in the Court's Order dated 6/7/2017 47 are Stayed pending the District Judge's ruling on plaintiff's objections and further Order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/26/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting defendants' 44 Motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline and granting plaintiff's 38 & 45 Motions to extend the discovery deadline in this matter. The discovery deadline is extended to 8/7/2017 and the dispositive motion deadline is extended to 9/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/7/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 34 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 24 Report and Recommendation denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/30/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting defendants' 22 Motion to Strike plaintiff's reply to defendants' answer. The Clerk is directed to strike plaintiff's 19 notification of defendants factitious denials in response to complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/20/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 4 MOTION for a preliminary injunction should be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 9/2/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/16/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.