McDougald v. Esham et al
| Jerone McDougald |
| Lieutenant Esham, Lieutenant Joseph, C/O Queen, C/O Distel, Sgt. Bailey, C/O Grooms, Lieutenant Dyer, Lieutenant Smith, C/O Mullens, C/O Crabtree and Lightle |
| 1:2016cv00497 |
| April 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
The Court ADOPTS 70 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 51) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/15/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting defendants' 73 Motion to Stay the answer due dates for defendants Mullins and Porter pending a ruling by the District Court on the undresigned's 70 Report & Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/19/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
70
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Granted, and that the Court certify pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3) that the foregoing reasons of any Court order adopting this R&R would not be taken in good faith. It is also ORDERED that plaintiff's 68 MOTION to Compel is Denied; and plaintiff's 69 request for a further extension of time under rule 56(d) is Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/7/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/21/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting plaintiff's 47 Motion to Compel. Defendants are Ordered to respond to plaintiff's first request for production of documents and first set of interrogatories (Doc. 48 & 49) within (20) days of the date of this Order. Plai ntiff shall have until 2/7/2018 to file a response to 51 defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/21/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER that defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 47 MOTION to Compel within (14) days of the filing date of this Order. Plaintiff's request 51 to defer ruling on defendants' 54 MOTION for Summary Judgment is Granted pe nding resolution of plaintiff's 6/9/2017 motion to compel. Plaintiff's 37 Motion to Strike is Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/13/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to redraw claims 11 and motions for leave to amend the complaint 12 and 19 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 11/30/2016. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 11 MOTION to redraw claims, and MOTIONS 12 & 19 for leave to amend the complaint be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/4/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
