Johnson v. Mahlman et al
Plaintiff: Damon Johnson
Defendant: Linnea Mahlman and Michael Dillow
Case Number: 1:2016cv00503
Filed: April 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: SCIOTO
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 DECISION AND ENTRY adopting the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 58); Plaintiff's objection (Doc. 60) is overruled; Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46) is granted; and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 50) is denied. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/28/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 58 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 46 Defendant Michael Dillow's Motion for Summary Judgment, 50 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment 46 be GRANTED, Plaintiff 9;s motion for summary judgment 50 be DENIED; and this case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 1/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/4/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/5/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/2/16. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND DECLINING IN PART THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/21/2016. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Mahlman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damon Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linnea Mahlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Dillow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?