MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Sneed III
MB Financial Bank, N.A. |
Sneed III and Malcolm H. Sneed III |
1:2016cv00531 |
May 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Timothy S Black |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT re: AMENDED ORDER (Doc. #15 ). (gs) |
Filing 15 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. #12 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/26/17. (gs) |
Filing 14 DEFAULT JUDGMENT re: ORDER (Doc. #13 ) (mr) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. #12 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/2/2016. (mr) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Default Judgment against Malcolm H. Sneed, III by Plaintiff MB Financial Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 8/1/2016 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Lowe Johnson, Sherry) |
Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendant Malcolm H. Sneed III. (jee) |
Filing 10 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Malcolm H. Sneed, III . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Lowe Johnson, Sherry) |
Notice of Correction: re #9 Affidavit of Service, Summons Returned Executed - incorrect filing event used and incorrect party chosen as served. Clerk corrected answer date for Defendant and regenerated NEF. (jee) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Malcolm H. Sneed III answer due 6/15/2016. (jee) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Malcolm H. Sneed III. Malcolm H. Sneed III served on 5/25/2016, answer due 6/15/2016. (Lowe Johnson, Sherry) Modified docket text and set answer date for defendant on 6/7/2016 (jee). |
Notice of Correction re: #8 Affidavit of Service, This entry was filed incorrectly. Counsel was notified and she will refile using Civil Events Initial Pleadings and Service Service of ProcessSummons Returned Executed. Clerk restricted #8 to court users only. (jlw) |
Filing 8 *DISREGARD THIS ENTRY IT WAS FILED IN ERROR* AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Malcolm H. Sneed III on May 23, 2016, filed by Plaintiff MB Financial Bank, N.A.. (Lowe Johnson, Sherry) Modified to restrict entry to court users only on 6/6/2016 (jlw). |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Malcolm H. Sneed III. (jee) |
Filing 6 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Wilhelm, Paul) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sherry Lowe Johnson. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/13/2016. (mr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff MB Financial Bank, N.A. re #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sherry Lowe Johnson (Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0648-5489421) Certificate of Good Standing (Wilhelm, Paul) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff MB Financial Bank, N.A.. (Wilhelm, Paul) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sherry Lowe Johnson (Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0648-5489421) by Plaintiff MB Financial Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 5/31/2016 (Attachments: #1 Appendix IL Certificate, #2 Appendix PA Certificate, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Wilhelm, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Guaranty against Malcolm H. Sneed III ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-5489316), filed by MB Financial Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilhelm, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.