Bates v. Shostak et al
Robert Bates |
Roman Shostak, Kevin Dunn, James Wilson and Jason Back |
1:2016cv00534 |
May 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
SCIOTO |
Michael R. Barrett |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER granting adopting Report and Recommendation re 38 Report and Recommendation granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/9/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 36 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 22 Report and Recommendation denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/21/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 15 be DENIED. Either party may file additional dispositive motion on or before the final dispos itive motion deadline of 7/31/2017. Objections to R&R due by 6/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/22/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.