Enoch v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Office et al
| Vanessa Enoch |
| Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Sheriff Hogan, Deputy Sheriff Nobles, Jim Neil and Unknown County Deputy Sheriffs |
| 1:2016cv00661 |
| June 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BUTLER |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
NOTATION ORDER finding as moot 198 plaintiffs' Motion to File Trial ExhibitsAs Part of the Record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/18/2023. (art)
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER that Plaintiff Vanessa Enochs motion for attorney fees 162 and motion for supplemental fee award 179 ) are GRANTED subject to a reduction for hours spent solely on non-prevailing plaintiff Avery Corbins claims; Attorney Robert Newman is aw arded $182,307.37 in attorney fees and $20,800.00 for supplemental attorney fees; Attorney Michael OHara is awarded $326,976.42 in attorney fees and $16,537.50 for supplemental attorney fees; Attorney Robert Newman is awarded $446.90 in costs; and Attorney Michael OHara is awarded $1,493.55 in costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/21/2022. (art)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER that 1. Plaintiff Avery Corbins motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict 158 is DENIED; 2. Defendants motion for judgment as a matter of law 163 is DENIED; and 3. Defendant must file any response to plaintiff Enochs motion for attorney fees 162 no later than TWENTY-ONE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/9/2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/9/2022. (art)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER that Plaintiffs motion in limine 133 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Neither plaintiffs nor defendant will reference the Sixth Circuits probable cause finding during voir dire or opening statements; Defendants motion in limine to exclude testimony related to Judge Nadels recording ban statements 136 is GRANTED; Defendants motion in limine to exclude testimony related to racial animus 137 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/2/2022. (art)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 127 Plaintiffs motion in limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/2/2021. (art)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER that the briefing schedule set out in this Courts Order of July 27, 2021 123 is hereby stayed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the Court on September 24, 2021, advising the Court as to whether the case has settled. In the event the case has not settled, the Joint Status Report shall include proposed dates to complete the briefing set out in the Courts Order of July 27, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/7/2021. (art)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER that the County defendants motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment 112 is GRANTED as to (1) all remaining claims against defendants Nobles and Hogan in their individual capacity, and (2) all remaining official capacity claims against de fendants Hamilton County Sheriffs Office, Hamilton County Sheriff Jim Neil, and Nobles and Hogan (which are construed as claims against Hamilton County), with the exception of plaintiffs official capacity claim for speech-based retaliation under the First Amendment. The County defendants motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment 112 is DENIED as to plaintiffs official capacity claim against Hamilton County for speech-based retaliation under the First Amendment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/1/2021. (art)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER that the Court Denies defendants' 83 Motion for Summary Judgment in all respects; Grants plaintiffs' 84 Motion for Summary judgment on plaintiffs' First and Fourth Amendment claims (Counts I, II, and III); and Denies defendants' 92 Motion for sanctions for spoliation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/19/2019. (art)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER 1. Denying as Moot 40 defendants Wolfzorn, Knight, Ferguson and Horton's Motion to Dismiss. 2. Defendants' 41 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is Granted as to: Plaintiffs' claims against all defendants u nder Count IV- Excessive Force-Fourth amendment; Count VII- State Law Claims: Malicious Prosecution; Court IX-State Law Claim: False Imprisonment/False Arrest; and Count XI-State Law Claim: Assault and Battery. Plaintiffs' claims against defend ant Neil in his individual capacity. 3. Defendants' 41 Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is Denied as to: Plaintiffs' 1983 claims against defendant Neil in his official capacity and defendants Hogan and Nobles in their individ ual capacity under Count 1-Violation of Free Speech Rights-First and Fourteenth Amendments; Count II- Violation of Fourth Amendment Rights; Count III-False Arrest/Unlawful Detention/False Imprisonment-Fourth amendment; and Count V-Malicious Prosecuti on-Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs' claim against defendant Neil in his official capacity under Count VI-Ratification-Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs' claims under Count VIII-State Law Claim: Negligent and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Count X-State Law Claim: Invasion of Privacy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/18/2017. (art)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying as Moot plaintiff Vanessa Enoch's 46 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing; and denying as Moot 33 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/28/2017. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
