Middlebrook v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Middlebrook v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility

Middlebrook v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility

Petitioner:	Terrance Middlebrook
Respondent:	Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Case Number:	1:2016cv00694
Filed:	May 12, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HOCKING
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2017	Filing 13 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 12 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/11/2017. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 14, 2016	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 10 MOTION to Dismiss be Denied and, instead, that the instant 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be administratively Stayed and Terminated on the Court's active docket pending petitioner� 39;s exhaustion of his ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim in the state courts. The stay should be conditioned on petitioner's (1) filing a delayed reopening application under ORAR 26(B) with the Ohio Court of Appeals, First Appel late District, within (30) days of entry of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) filing a motion to reinstate the case on this Court's active docket within (30) days after fully exhausting the state-court remedy. Petitione r should be granted leave to reinstate the case on the Court's active docket when he has exhausted his ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim in the state courts based on showing that he has complied with the conditions of the stay. Objections to R&R due by 12/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/14/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2017

Filing 13 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 12 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/11/2017. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

December 14, 2016

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 10 MOTION to Dismiss be Denied and, instead, that the instant 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be administratively Stayed and Terminated on the Court's active docket pending petitioner� 39;s exhaustion of his ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim in the state courts. The stay should be conditioned on petitioner's (1) filing a delayed reopening application under ORAR 26(B) with the Ohio Court of Appeals, First Appel late District, within (30) days of entry of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) filing a motion to reinstate the case on this Court's active docket within (30) days after fully exhausting the state-court remedy. Petitione r should be granted leave to reinstate the case on the Court's active docket when he has exhausted his ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim in the state courts based on showing that he has complied with the conditions of the stay. Objections to R&R due by 12/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/14/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Middlebrook v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terrance Middlebrook
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Mary Anne Reese
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?