Lucas v. Doe et al
| Vincent Lucas |
| John Doe, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
| 1:2016cv00790 |
| July 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| CLERMONT |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's third motion for default judgment against Defendants Callvation and Torres 176 should be GRANTED; (2) a judgment in the amount of $5,700.00 should be entered in Plainti ff's favor for the two illegal calls against Defendants Callvation and Torres, who should be held jointly and severally liable; (3) Plaintiff's motion to vacate or withdraw his Notice of Appeal 177 also should be GRANTED, with the Clerk o f Court directed to return to Plaintiff the previously paid appellate filing fee ($505.00); (4) this case should be CLOSED after the docket is corrected to reflect the termination of all parties. Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 11/9/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation re 171 Report and Recommendation which denies 167 Motion for Default Judgment; and grants 167 Motion to Reopen Case; Plaintiff must obtain an entry of default from the Clerk of Courts and fil e a second renewed motion for default judgment WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. If Plaintiff fails to do so within 30 days, the Court will dismiss the remaining claims with prejudice for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/25/20. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 161 Report and Recommendation granting 124 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and denying 146 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/31/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
161
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 124 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendants 310 Network Inc., Nextinteractive Inc. and Rodolfo Salazar, 146 Plaintiff's Motion for Civil and/or Criminal Contempt filed by Plaintiff Vinc ent Lucas. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) The Salazar Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 124 should be GRANTED; and (2) Plaintiff's motion for civil and/or criminal contempt 146 should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 5/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/1/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 122 Report and Recommendation denying 87 Motion for Sanctions; denying 93 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 94 Motion to Dismiss; granting 94 Motion to Sever; striking 98 Motion to Dis miss; granting 103 Motion for Leave to File; granting 104 Motion to Set Aside Default; denying 115 Motion to Strike ; denying 117 Motion for Sanctions; denying 120 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/31/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 65 Report and Recommendation granting 32 Motion to Strike; granting 33 Motion to Vacate upon the substitution of a correctly named party; granting 50 Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 4/18/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's motions for an additional extension of time to complete service upon Defendant Jeffrey Torres, and to conduct discovery on a related corporation to discover the residential address o r Mr. Torres and/or a location where he can be served, 35 63 are GRANTED up to and including 5/15/2017; (2) Defendants' motion for leave to permit Attorney Joshua L Spoont to appear pro hac vice 61 is GRANTED; (3) The Filippo Defendants� 39; unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply memorandum 64 is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the Report and Recommendation filed today; (4) Based upon the R&R that recommends setting aside the Entry of Default against them, the Filippo Defendants shall appear and file their Answer and Affirmative Defenses 50 on or before 3/31/2017. Absent rejection of the pending R&R, the Answer of the Filippo Defendants shall be considered as if timely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 3/20/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time until 2/3/17 to achieve service on all domestic Defendants; denying Plaintiff's additional request for an order directing the Office of the Clerk of Court to include multiple service forms for both individual and corporate Defendants in a single envelope addressed only to the individual Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/18/17. (sct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
