Williams v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Williams v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.

Williams v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.

Plaintiff:	Charles Williams
Defendant:	Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv00888
Filed:	September 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply toproceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 9, 2016	Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/9/16. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. 2. The Court should certify that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation wo uld not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2016. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply toproceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

September 9, 2016

Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/9/16. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. 2. The Court should certify that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation wo uld not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2016. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?