Pullen v. Conschafsky et al
| Gary Lee Pullen |
| Conschafsky, Ron Erdos, Cool, C. Davis, Oppy, Toppins, Spears, Cassner, Mahlman, Clagg, Jane Doe Nurse, Sammons, Larry Green, Sears and Broughton |
| 1:2016cv00894 |
| September 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 95 Report and Recommendation dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure of service. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/8/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 93 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice against defendants Cool, Davis,Erdos, Ford, Goodman, Mahlman, Nolan, Parsons, Prise, and Toppins for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/14/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
95
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that because plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's 11/20/2018 show cause order and plaintiff has not shown good cause for failure to serve the complaint on defendant Conschafsky, that plaintiff's complaint against defendant Conschafsky be Dismissed without prejudice for failure of service and this entire case be Closed on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 12/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/10/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 91 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's complaint against defendants Spears, Summers, Lahr, and Seal be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/5/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. 53 ); Plaintiff's Motion, (Doc. 48 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/25/2018. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 60 Motion to reissue service on eight unserved defendants ; and granting plaintiff's 61 Motion to extend the discovery deadline in this matter. Plaintiff's motion to reserve defendant Toppins is Denied. However, plaintiff's motion is Granted with respect to the seven remaining unserved defendants. To the extent that these defendants are former employees of SOCF, It Is Ordered that the Office of the Attorney Gener al shall file under seal the last know home address of defendants Conschafsky, Summers, Spears, Prise, Seal, Nolan, and Lahr within (14) days. It is further Ordered the the USM shall serve a copy of the summons and amended complaint on defendants Co nschafsky, Summers, Spears, Prise, Seal, Nolan, and Lahr via certified mail at the address provided by the Ohio Attorney General's Office, and the Return of Service shall be filed under seal. The discovery deadline is hereby extended to 6/14/20 18 and the deadline for both parties to file dispositive motions in this matter is extended to 7/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/15/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified to correct docket text on 3/15/2018 (art).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 59 Report and Recommendation denying 51 and 52 Motions for TRO and Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/27/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 and 31 Report and Recommendation denying as moot 17 Objections and denying 50 Motion for Extension of Time to File and striking 56 Objections. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/8/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 2/8/2018 (ba) to edit text and regenerate a NEF.
|
|
Filing
59
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 51 & 52 MOTIONS for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining orders be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/4/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying plaintiff's 40 Motion to Stay pending hunger strike; and denying as Moot plaintiff's 44 Motion for leave to stay proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/31/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying as Moot plaintiff's 23 Motion to Stay proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/13/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
