McDougald v. Eaches et al
| Jerone McDougald |
| Jeremy Eaches, Haywood, G. Grooms, Combs, Osborne, Jane Doe Nurse and Warren |
| 1:2016cv00900 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott denying 86 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 88 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re 91 Report and Recommendations. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
82
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 80 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/4/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying plaintiff's 73 & 74 Motions for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/26/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING 58 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on August 17, 2018 (Doc. 58). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, defendants motions for summary judgment (docs. 28 and 51) are GRANTED.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 11/1/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that summary judgment be Granted to defendants on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim and this case be Closed on the docket of the Court. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/2/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
58
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' MOTIONS 28 & 51 for Summary Judgment be Granted. It is Ordered that plaintiff's 56 Motions to amend and 55 supplement his response in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judg ment are Granted; plaintiff's 37 & 54 MOTIONS to supplement his response in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment are Denied; Plaintiff's 57 MOTION to proceed to judgment is Denied as Moot. The parties, within (2 0) days of the filing of this Order, Show Cause why summary judgment should not be granted for defendants on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim as it appears there is no causal connection between defendant Eaches' use of pepper s pray and any protected conduct by plaintiff. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2018.) Parties Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/17/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying plaintiff's 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying plaintiff's 45 Motion for Sanctions; denying plaintiff's 46 Motion to Strike ; and granting ;defendants' 48 Motion for Leave to File as timely defendant Nurse Rayburn's answer; and granting defendant Nurse Rayburn's 50 Motion for Leave to File a supplement to defendants' motion for summary judgment; and granting plaintiff's 52 Motion for Leave to Filereply to defendant Nurse Rayburn's supplement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/5/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying plaintiff's MOTIONS: denying 35 Motion to Produce; denying 19 Motion to Compel; denying 22 Motion for status update ; denying 29 Motion for status update ; denying 29 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/2/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's supplemental complaint be Dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and this matter proceed on his claims against: (1) defendants Eaches and Grooms in their individual capacities to the extent that plaintiff has alleged those two individuals participated in the use of excessive force in the incident that allegedly occurred on 5/2/2016 at SOCF; (2) defendants Eaches, Haywood and Grooms in thei r individual capacities to the extend that plaintiff has alleged those individuals took actions against him during the 5/2/2016 incident in retaliation for his having filed lawsuits against their fellow co-workers at SOCF; and (3) defendants Osbor ne, Combs, Haywood and "Jane Doe" nurse in their individual capacities to the extent that plaintiff has alleged those defendants failed to ensure that the was decontaminated and/or received proper medical care after the pepper-spraying incident. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 11/30/16. Defendant Warren is DISMISSED as a party to the action because plaintiff's allegations against him do not state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In addition, any claim based on plaintiff's allegations that the defendants involved in the pepper-spraying incident filed false conduct reports and the "Jane Doe" nurse falsified a medical examination report is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
