Parks v. Warden, Correctional Industries Facility

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Parks v. Warden, Correctional Industries Facility

Parks v. Warden, Correctional Industries Facility

Petitioner:	Warren Parks
Respondent:	Warden, Correctional Industries Facility
Case Number:	1:2016cv00992
Filed:	October 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2016	Filing 4 JUDGMENT signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 12/2/16. IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2 ) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioners Petition for a Writ o f Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 -1), is DISMISSED with prejudice on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. Any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis of this judgment would be not be taken in good faith, and therefore, would be DENIED upon a showing of financial necessity. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1 ) be, and hereby is, DENIED AS MOOT. Case Terminated. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 17, 2016	Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. A certificate of appealability should not is sue in this matter. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore should Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/17/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2016

Filing 4 JUDGMENT signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 12/2/16. IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2 ) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioners Petition for a Writ o f Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 -1), is DISMISSED with prejudice on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. Any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis of this judgment would be not be taken in good faith, and therefore, would be DENIED upon a showing of financial necessity. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1 ) be, and hereby is, DENIED AS MOOT. Case Terminated. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

October 17, 2016

Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. A certificate of appealability should not is sue in this matter. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore should Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/17/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parks v. Warden, Correctional Industries Facility
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Warren Parks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Correctional Industries Facility
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?