Lucas v. Total Security Vision, Inc. et al
| Vincent Lucas |
| Total Security Vision, Inc. and Mohammad A. Ullah |
| 1:2016cv01102 |
| November 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| CLERMONT |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 57 Report and Recommendation granting in part 36 Motion to Strike; granting 47 Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 1/14/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's motion to compel and for sanctions 64 is GRANTED. As soon as practicable, but not later than 1/7/2019, Defendants shall produce substantive responses to the discovery previous ly compelled by the 10/9/2018 Order. The current discovery and dispositive motion deadlines of 12/23/2018 are hereby EXTENDED to thirty (30) days following the date that the R&R filed on 9/21/2018 57 is adopted or rejected by the presiding distric t judge. On or before 1/31/2019, Defendants shall pay the sum of $500.00 to Plaintiff as a sanction for the failure to comply with the Court's 10/9/2018 Order. Defendants also are deemed to have waived any and all objections to the discove ry compelled by that Order. If Defendants fail to produce the twice-ordered discovery, or fail to timely complete payment to Plaintiff of the $500.00 sanctions, additional monetary sanctions may be imposed, and additional non-monetary sanctions will be seriously considered. Within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file his answer to Defendants' counterclaim; (2) Defendants' two motions to quash 68 69 are GRANTED only in part, and in all other respec ts are DENIED. The motions to quash are granted to the extent that the scope of the subpoenas shall be limited in time to 1/1/2014 through 12/31/2015. The motions to quash are denied as moot with respect to Citibank and Bill.com, and other than the time limitation imposed above, are denied as to all other outstanding subpoenas on this issue. Defendants' request for a hearing on their first motion to quash is denied; (3) Plaintiff's motion for disclosure of the information previously supplied by Dinsmore & Shohl to this Court 71 is GRANTED. The information filed ex parte and under seal on 5/22/2018 43 is hereby UNSEALED and shall be made a part of the public record of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/19/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
57
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiff's motion to strike certain affirmative defenses 36 be GRANTED IN PART, and that paragraphs 20, 22, 26, 27, 32, 37, 46, and 51 be STRICKEN from Defendants' Answer, but that the motion be DENIED as to the defenses contained in paragraphs 38 and 50. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion for leave to file a counterclaim 47 be CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, unless Defendant Ullah failed to appear for his deposition on 8/17/2018, in which case the motion should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 9/21/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER granting 40 Counsel for Defendants Mohammad A Ullah and Total Security Vision, Inc's motion to withdraw from further representation, subject to counsel's best efforts to serve a copy of this Order on the Defendant s via U.S. Postal mail and email. Defendants shall retain new counsel on or before 6/25/2018. Defendant Ullah is reminded that a corporation cannot proceed pro se in federal court. If Mr. Ullah wishes to proceed pro se in his own defense, he must file a Notice of that intention on or before 6/25/2018. Discovery will be STAYED until 6/25/2018. Following 6/25/2018, Plaintiff may seek to take Defendant Ullah's deposition, if desired, by serving a proper notice of the s ame on new counsel, or alternatively, upon the pro se Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/25/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 17 Report and Recommendation denying 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 7 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 12 Motion to Supplement Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/19/17. (ba)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
