United States of America for the use and benefit of Site Max, Inc. et al v. AACON General Contracting, LLC et al
United States of America for the use and benefit of Site Max, Inc, United States of America and Site Max, Inc. |
AACON General Contracting, LLC, Aacon General Contractors and Federal Insurance Company |
1:2016cv01108 |
November 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Susan J Dlott |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE by Plaintiff Site Max, Inc. Dismissal of All Claims Against AACON General Contracting, LLC without Prejudice (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Plaintiff Site Max, Inc.. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
NOTICE by the Court VACATING the status/scheduling conference scheduled for 6/15/17. Counsel for pltf and dft Federal Insurance Company have resolved their dispute. A motion to amend the complaint is forthcoming (wam) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION for Default Judgment against Federal Insurance Company filed by Plaintiff Site Max, Inc.. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Status/Scheduling Conference set for 6/15/2017 03:00 PM in Chambers before Judge Susan J. Dlott. (vp) |
NOTATION ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott vacating the conference scheduled for June 1, 2017. (vp) |
NOTATION ORDER BY Judge Susan J. Dlott granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 New date requested 6/8/2017. (vp) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Continue June 1, 2017 Conference by Plaintiff Site Max, Inc.. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Response in Opposition to Motion New date requested 6/8/2017. by Plaintiff Site Max, Inc.. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Status/Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2017 10:00 AM in Chambers before Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Conrad Olson for Defendant Federal Insurance Company (Olson, David) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION for Default Judgment against Federal Insurance Company filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Unsigned Settlement Agreement) (Olson, David) |
Notice of Correction re: #5 MOTION for Default Judgment against Federal Insurance Company, Docket Text Modified to "Application For Default Judgement" (bjc) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT against Federal Insurance Company by Plaintiffs Site Max, Inc., United States of America. (McSherry, Jeffrey) Modified to clarify docket text on 5/5/2017 (jlw). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Federal Insurance Company. Federal Insurance Company served on 4/6/2017, answer due 4/27/2017. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant AACON General Contracting, LLC. AACON General Contracting, LLC served on 12/21/2016, answer due 1/11/2017. (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to AACON General Contracting, LLC, Federal Insurance Company. (eh) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Endorsed Hereon against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-5744646), filed by Site Max, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form, #2 Summons Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (McSherry, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.