Allgeyer v. Cincinnati City of et al
Mary Jill Allgeyer |
Cincinnati City of, Harry Black and Georgetta Kelly |
1:2016cv01128 |
December 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R. Barrett |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 Order Overruling 31 38 Objections, Adopting 30 Report and Recommendation, Granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Terminating Case. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 07/01/2020. (kaf) |
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court for Plaintiff's Summary Judgment on Pleadings Granting Relief, which is construed as a motion seeking leave to file an untimely motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/13/2020. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' motion for summary judgment 23 be GRANTED as to all remaining claims, and that this case be closed. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 4/1/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 17 ORDER adopting 14 Order by the Magistrate Judge; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/31/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' construed motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs claims 12 be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All claims rel ating to Plaintiffs' 1993 termination, all claims relating to the Citys failure to promote her throughout her employment, and all claims alleging discriminatory terms and conditions of her employment should be dismissed as time-barred except for Plaintiff's "failure to promote" claims alleging race and age discrimination based upon the City's failure to promote Plaintiff to positions for which Plaintiff submitted applications on or after 11/27/2015. Discovery shall conti nue to proceed only on the specified failure-to-promote claims. Additionally, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT all claims against individual Defendants Black and Kelly, and Plaintiff's hostile work environment claims, be DISMISSED for failure to state any claim. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/5/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.