Pettus-Brown v. Hamilton County Ohio et al
LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown |
Hamilton County Ohio and Hamilton County Prosecutor |
1:2017cv00032 |
January 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Michael R. Barrett |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 2 Report and Recommendation dismissing 1 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/13/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's pleading entitled 1 "Bill in Chancery/Equity and Injunctive Relief" be Dismissed with prejudice, with the caveat that the dismissal may not be construed as precluding plaintiff from filing a habeas petition challenging any conviction or sentence he may receive in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Case No. B1605805 after he has exhausted all available state-court remedies. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith , and therefore Deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/20/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.