Sudberry v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Sudberry v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Sudberry v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution

Petitioner:	James Sudberry, r
Respondent:	Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Case Number:	1:2017cv00045
Filed:	January 17, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	WARREN
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations. The Petition (Doc. 4 ) is TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit for further proceedings consistent with the Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/17/2017. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 28, 2017	Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that because this Court lacks jurisdiction in this mater involving a successive habeas petition within the meaning of 28:2244(b), petitioner's re 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Transferred to the Sixth (6th ) Circuit for further proceedings as required under 28:2244(b)(3). Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/28/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations. The Petition (Doc. 4 ) is TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit for further proceedings consistent with the Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/17/2017. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

February 28, 2017

Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that because this Court lacks jurisdiction in this mater involving a successive habeas petition within the meaning of 28:2244(b), petitioner's re 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Transferred to the Sixth (6th ) Circuit for further proceedings as required under 28:2244(b)(3). Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/28/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sudberry v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Sudberry, r
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?