Nored v. Cuoco

Nored v. Cuoco

Plaintiff:	Colonel Antonio Nored
Defendant:	John A. Cuoco
Case Number:	1:2017cv00134
Filed:	March 1, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2017	Filing 21 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 18 Report and Recommendation; Defendant John A. Cuoco is dismissed form this case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/28/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 12, 2017	Filing 12 ORDER denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Cause and Just Compensation; denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Mr. Cuoco via email. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) To the extent it has not alrea dy done so, the U.S. Marshal shall serve YouTube in accordance with the forms provided by Plaintiff on 5/23/2017; (2) Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to locate Mr. Cuoco 11 is GRANTED IN PART. On or before 8/15/2017, Plainti ff shall complete a new summons form and U.S. Marshal form in order to effectuate service on Defendant John A. Cuoco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/12/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2017

Filing 21 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 18 Report and Recommendation; Defendant John A. Cuoco is dismissed form this case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/28/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

June 12, 2017

Filing 12 ORDER denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Cause and Just Compensation; denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Mr. Cuoco via email. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) To the extent it has not alrea dy done so, the U.S. Marshal shall serve YouTube in accordance with the forms provided by Plaintiff on 5/23/2017; (2) Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to locate Mr. Cuoco 11 is GRANTED IN PART. On or before 8/15/2017, Plainti ff shall complete a new summons form and U.S. Marshal form in order to effectuate service on Defendant John A. Cuoco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/12/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nored v. Cuoco
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colonel Antonio Nored
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John A. Cuoco
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?